Legal Opinion
City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 11, 2012No. A12A0620PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
The City of Baldwin, Georgia (City) appeals after a jury awarded Woodard & Curran, Inc. (W&C) $203,000 on its claim for money owed under a contract to provide services for the City’s wastewater treatment plant. Because there was sufficient evidence to support the award, we affirm.
The record shows that W&C sued for breach of a contract under which it was to be paid for engineering and design services for the City’s water system (May contract). W&C claimed that it provided supporting engineering documents for the City’s application for government stimulus funds to improve the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Nelson & Hill, P.A. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- PMS Construction Co. v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. DASD CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Monitronics International, Inc. v. VeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Rowe v. Law Offices of Ben C. Brodhead, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- City of Baldwin, Georgia v. Woodard & CurranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.