Legal Opinion

City of Baldwin, Georgia v. Woodard & Curran

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 30, 2013No. A12A0620Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOURTH DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., ANDREWS, P. J., AND BOGGS, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ August 30, 2013 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A0620. CITY OF BALDWIN v. WOODARD & CURRAN, INC. ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. In City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran,

316 Ga. App. 768

( 730 SE2d 486) (2012), we affirmed the jury verdict awarding Woodard & Curran $203,000 for work done on the City of Baldwin’s water treatment system. Our Supreme Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API