Legal Opinion
Gualco v. City of Bakersfield
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1927No. Docket Nos. 5923, 5924, 5925, 5926, 5927, 5928, 5929, 5930, 5931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
These actions, consolidated into one appeal, are all for the purpose of quieting title against certain street assessement liens arising from public proceedings taken for the paving of certain portions of Twentieth and Twenty-first Streets in the City of Bakersfield. Judgment was for defendants upon demurrers to the complaints.
Appellants advance two main reasons for the invalidity of the assessment liens. First: That in addition to following the procedure of the Improvement Act of 1911, which requires notice for bids to be published for two days only, the public authorities of the city should…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stanwood v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Warren Brothers Co. v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Woodworth v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brydon v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Superior Court of Alameda Cty. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949