Legal Opinion
Dolan v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 14, 2010No. 09-367PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION OF THE COURT
[560 U.S. 607]
2Opinion of the Court · BreyerJustice Breyer
This case concerns the remedy for missing a statutory deadline. The statute in question focuses upon mandatory restitution for victims of crimes. It provides that “the court
[560 U.S. 608]
shall set a date for the final determination of the victim’s losses, not to exceed 90 days after sentencing.” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5). We hold that a sentencing court that misses the 90-day deadline nonetheless retains the power to order restitution—at least where, as here, the sentencing court made clear prior to the deadline’s expiration that it would order restitution,…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by211 opinions
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. Donald WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Kwai Wong v. David BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Manrique v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.