Legal Opinion

Stauffer v. Hubley Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1942No. Appeal, 209PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

This is a claim for workmen’s compensation, (1) for total disability, and (2) for death, alleged to have been caused by silicosis, filed under the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 566. The provisions of this Act differ from those of the prior Act of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2714 — which it repealed — as respects, inter alia, disability or death caused by silicosis, anthraco-silicosis or asbestosis.

The Act of 1937 provided in section 4(b) : “Compensation shall not be payable for partial disability due to silicosis, anthraco-silicosis, or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. McIntyre v. E. J. Lavino & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Kelley v. Pittsburgh Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roschak Et Ux. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Jaloneck v. Jarecki Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Holahan v. Bergen Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Anderson v. Schroeder Monumental WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Fronko v. United States Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API