Legal Opinion

Tush v. Pharr

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2003No. S-10229PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Trudy Tush appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment against her on four separate motions. Because genuine issues of material fact remain on all four, we reverse the order of the superior court granting summary judgment on each motion and we remand the case to the superior court for further proceedings.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

Trudy Tush and her former husband Larry Tush sued Hector Perez to evict him. Tush owns numerous rental properties and has been involved in real estate investment for over twenty years. Perez was one of her…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Allstate Insurance v. RoelfsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1987
  3. Weaver Bros., Inc. v. ChappelAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Milliner v. Elmer Fox and Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Barkett v. BrucatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Rhodes v. ErionAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brannon v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Sengupta v. WickwireAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. L.D.G., Inc. v. RobinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API