Legal Opinion

Brannon v. Continental Casualty Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2006No. S-11505PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Paul and Rance Brannon sued Terry Pfleiger. When his insurer, Continental Casualty Company, failed to defend him, Pfleiger assigned to the Brannons his rights arising from Continental's failure to defend. The Brannons then sued Continental. Pfieiger later confessed judgment to the Brannons in the underlying lawsuit. Rea soning that the statute of limitations began running on Pfleiger's claims against Continental when Continental denied Pfleiger a defense, the superior court dismissed the Brannons' suit against Continental as untimely. We hold that the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Shaw v. State, Department of Administration, Public Defender AgencyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Afcan v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Noland v. Virginia Insurance ReciprocalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Egner v. Talbot's, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Krause v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Christianson v. Conrad-Houston InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API