Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 2005No. 02-4169-DFE; A121088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment sentencing her to 70 months of imprisonment after she pleaded guilty to second-degree robbery, a so-called “Measure 11” crime, that is, one that carries a statutory minimum sentence under ORS 137.700. She assigns error to the trial court’s ruling that as a matter of law she did not qualify for a lesser sentence under ORS 137.712(2)(d), which provides a discretionary exception to the Measure 11 sentence for second-degree robbery and permits the court to impose a shorter sentence calculated under the sentencing guidelines. We conclude that we do not have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. StubbsOregon Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API