Legal Opinion

Fandozzi v. Kelly Hotel, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Kelly Hotel, Inc. (Appellee) and against Anna Fandozzi and Alexander Shish (collectively, Appellants), respectively the administratrix and administrator of the estate of Anthony Shish, on the issue of liability under the Dram Shop Act, 47 P.S. section 4-493. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

Summary judgment is governed by Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1035.2, which provides:

After the relevant pleadings are closed, but within such time as not to unreasonably delay trial, any party may move for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. JarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Couts v. GhionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Borden, Inc. v. Advent Ink Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. SpeightsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schuenemann v. Dreemz, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Kalenka v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Deangelis v. KC'S Pub, LLC (In Re KC'S Pub, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Estate of Mickens v. Stevenson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County2002
  5. Hinebaugh v. Pennsylvania Snowseekers Snowmobile Club, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API