State v. Kevin Lynch
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The defendant, Kevin Lynch, appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of misdemeanor simple assault. See RSA 631:2-a (2016). He argues that the Superior Court (Wageling, J.) erred by denying his motion to suppress his statements to police allegedly obtained in violation of his Miranda, rights. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). He also argues that the Superior Court (Schulman, J.) erred by permitting hearsay testimony from a pediatrician at trial. The State cross-appeals the trial court’s order dismissing two indictments post-trial on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GuzmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Max WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. Brian WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- State v. ChalpinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
- State v. Van UdenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.