Legal Opinion
State v. Max Wilson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 25, 2017No. 2015-0404PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Max Wilson, appeals his convictions, following a jury trial in Superior Court (Smukler, J.), on four counts of violating RSA 632-A:10 (2016), which prohibits persons convicted of certain offenses from providing child care services. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The jury could have found the following facts. The defendant is a New Hampshire registered sex offender. At trial, the State and the defendant stipulated that the defendant had been convicted of a sexual assault, which is a qualifying conviction under RSA 632-A:10, I. He registered at least seven times…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Edward G. ProctorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- State v. Jose Batista-SalvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- State v. ChalpinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
- Ronald W. Martin v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison for MenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- State v. Shawn PlantamuroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.