Legal Opinion

State v. Brian Watson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 1, 2018No. 2017-0104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, C.J.

The defendant, Brian A. Watson, appeals his conviction by a jury for felony sale of a controlled drug with death resulting. See RSA 318-B:26, IX (2017) (amended 2017). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court ( O'Neill , J.) erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress statements allegedly obtained in violation of his Miranda rights, see Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) ; and (2) allowing a forensic toxicologist, Dr. Daniel Isenschmid, to testify to the results of toxicology tests that he did not conduct. We affirm.

I

A

Because the defendant has not…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Watson v. EdmarkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
  3. Rainey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. State v. Reilly O. LeithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  5. Earl Dean Robbins v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API