Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 2009No. CR 09-345Published

1Opinion of the Court

JjMOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK

2Per curiam

Appellant Daniel Dorsey, by and through his attorney Richard R. West, seeks a motion for rule on clerk. The State has not responded to the motion. Our clerk refused to accept the record because of a failure to show strict compliance with Ark. R.App. P.-Civ. 5(b)(1)(C).

Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal on September 15, 2008, making the record due in this court on December 15, 2008. On November 17, 2008, the circuit court entered an order granting an oral motion made by Appellant to extend the time for filing the record until April 5, 2009. In the instant…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Bond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Gwathney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API