Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Carroll v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1924No. 5,440PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This is an application for a writ of prohibition. (In this opinion the relator will be referred to as plaintiff and the respondents as defendant.) Upon the filing of plaintiff’s application an alternative writ was issued directing the defendants to appear on the seventh day of January, 1924, and show cause why the plaintiff should not be granted the relief which *418he sought. Upon the return day the defendants appeared and filed an answer. From the application and the answer it appears that the facts involved are as follows:

The North Sanders Irrigation District, a public corporation, was duly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mackey v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kings County v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Yale v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Deich v. DeichMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hogevoll v. HogevollMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. McCarthy v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API