Legal Opinion

Kings County v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894No. 18285PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding a peremptory writ of mandate, entered upon an order overruling a demurrer to the petition — the defendant declining to answer.

The petition shows that defendant was and is tax collector of Tulare county, the affiant being tax collector of Kings county. That Kings county was created May 29, 1893. That the fifteenth section of the act creating the county reads as follows:

“ Sec. 15. It shall be the duty of the tax collector of the county of Tulare, upon the demand of the tax collector of the county of Kings, to furnish, assign, and transfer to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wenzler v. Municipal Court for the Pasadena Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. County of Colusa v. County of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Faires v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Board of School Directors v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Carroll v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API