Legal Opinion

Callahan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1986No. 50701PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Larry Callahan, movant, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of first degree robbery. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. See State v. Callahan, 650 S.W.2d 2 (Mo.App.1983). In his appeal from the trial court’s order denying his Rule 27.26 motion, movant raises two points: 1) The trial court, (Judge Davis), erred in failing to disqualify himself for cause in movant’s Rule 27.26 proceeding, and (2) the trial court erred in denying movant’s ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of BufordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. State v. HindmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Los v. LosSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. McDaris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Bruflat v. Mister Guy, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Callahan v. RendlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Lenny Szarek, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API