Legal Opinion

State v. Hindman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1976No. 9816PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

After a change of judge and a change of venue (Rule 30) 1 a jury found defendant guilty of assault with intent to kill Robert Dugger with malice aforethought (§ 559.-180) but could not agree upon the punishment to be inflicted. The court assessed punishment at 25 years’ imprisonment and rendered sentence and judgment accordingly. Rule 27.03.

The incidents involved occurred around midnight October 26 to 1 a.m. October 27, 1973. Carroll Renfro, asleep in his home 3 or 4 miles north of Hartville, was awakened “with a pounding on my door.” Upon answering the door he was greeted by…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. State v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. State v. LangSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State v. SinghMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. GullettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. HegwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API