Legal Opinion

Los v. Los

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 8, 1991PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Family Court which denied a motion seeking recusal of the trial judge. The appel lant, Simon G. Los, sought disqualification of the trial judge on the ground that Los had named the judge as a party defendant in federal litigation attacking the jurisdiction of the Family Court. The Family Court ruled that the federal litigation did not require automatic recusal and since the judge perceived no other basis for disqualification declined to recuse himself. We affirm that result as a proper exercise of discretion.

I

The facts underlying the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. State v. WalbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Steigler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API