King v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, Judge.
Movant appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted of sodomy and assault with intent to do great bodily harm in violation of § 563.230 and § 559.180, RSMo. 1969. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. King, 588 S.W.2d 147, 149 (Mo.App.1979).
Movant claims the trial court erred in finding no ineffective assistance of counsel, because his counsel, Allan Goodloe and Charles Shaw, had a conflict of interest when they represented movant’s co-defendant, Paul Seemiller, in Seemiller’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Franklin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Abrams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Honeycutt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Callahan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.