Watkins v. Wilhoit
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The instrument of assignment is void, as it has never been recorded as required by law. ■ (Civ. Code, secs. 1158-65, 1183, 3458, 3463, 3465, 3466, 3473; Pol. Code, sec. 4235; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Dolce, 87 N. Y. 257, 263; Schell v. Stein, 76 Pa. St. - 398; 18 Am. Pep. 416; Luck’s Appeal, 44 Pa.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The instrument of assignment is void, as it has never been recorded as required by law. ■ (Civ. Code, secs. 1158-65, 1183, 3458, 3463, 3465, 3466, 3473; Pol. Code, sec. 4235; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Dolce, 87 N. Y. 257, 263; Schell v. Stein, 76 Pa. St. - 398; 18 Am. Pep. 416; Luck’s Appeal, 44 Pa. St. 519; Anthony v. Butler, 13 Pet. 423; Sawyer v. Adams, 8 Yt. 172; 30 Am. Dec. 459; Tillman v. Cowand, 12 Smedes & M. 262; McKinnon v. McLean, 2 Dev. & B. 79; Beardsley v. Frame,…
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This action is in the nature of a creditor’s bill in equity to subject property in the hands or under the control of the defendants, Wilhoit and Lang-ford, to the payment of a judgment at law against defendant Bryant, in favor of the plaintiff.
A demurrer to the complaint having been sustained, *397and the plaintiff haying declined to amend his complaint, judgment passed for defendants.
The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment upon the judgment-roll containing a bill of exceptions showing that the demurrer was sustained on the grounds “that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Edwards v. GrandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cady v. PurserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Dougery v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.