Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Haldeman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1926No. Appeal, 90PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

In August, 1924, R. C. Haldeman, the defendant, was convicted by a magistrate of failure to attach license tags to the collars of Ms three setter dogs. On appeal, the quarter sessions court sustained the conviction; this was affirmed by the Superior Court (88 Pa. Superior Ct. 284), whereupon we allowed an appeal on the constitutional question.

Despite the wide range and unusual ability displayed in the presentation of the case, but little need be said in vindication of the action of the Superior Court. The prosecution was under the “Dog Law of 1921,” see Act of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. AldermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Mesta Machine Co. v. Dunbar Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Bagley Co., Inc. v. CameronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Knowles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Poor District Case (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API