Bagley Co., Inc. v. Cameron
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Moschziskee,
Appellant corporation was denied registration as a “dealer” under the Act of June 14,1923, P. L. 779, known as “The Securities Act”; hence this appeal.
The controlling questions involved may be considered under two general heads: (1) Does the statute offend article III, section 7, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, which provides: “The General Assembly shall not pass any local or special law......regulating labor, trade, mining or manufacturing”? (2) If the statute is constitutional, were the powers therein granted to the commissioner of banking and to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Suermann v. Hadley, Treas. (White)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Bacon Service Corporation v. Huss.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Com., Dept. of Ed. v. First SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Kellerman v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.