Stumpf v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*304ROSSMAN, J.
In this excess liability case, defendant insurance company (CNA) appeals a judgment entered in favor of Stiff, its insured, and the Stumpfs, his assignees, for damages allegedly resulting from its negligent evaluation, investigation and negotiation of a medical malpractice claim against Stiff. CNA makes forty-seven assignments of error, arguing, inter alia, that (1) it was entitled to make certain references at trial to the Professional Assessment Committee that reviewed the malpractice claim against Stiff; (2) it is not vicariously liable for conduct of counsel that it hired to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Stubblefield v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Lancaster v. Royal Insurance of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- International Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Horwitz v. Holabird & RootIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TraverTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- MEDICAL MUTUAL LIABILITY INS. SOC. OF MARYLAND v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Wailua Associates v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.