Legal Opinion

Stumpf v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1990No. A8404-02347; CA A46240PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*304ROSSMAN, J.

In this excess liability case, defendant insurance company (CNA) appeals a judgment entered in favor of Stiff, its insured, and the Stumpfs, his assignees, for damages allegedly resulting from its negligent evaluation, investigation and negotiation of a medical malpractice claim against Stiff. CNA makes forty-seven assignments of error, arguing, inter alia, that (1) it was entitled to make certain references at trial to the Professional Assessment Committee that reviewed the malpractice claim against Stiff; (2) it is not vicariously liable for conduct of counsel that it hired to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stubblefield v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lancaster v. Royal Insurance of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. International Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Horwitz v. Holabird & RootIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TraverTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. MEDICAL MUTUAL LIABILITY INS. SOC. OF MARYLAND v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Wailua Associates v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API