Legal Opinion
Stubblefield v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1973PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action against an insurance company by the husband of a woman who was allegedly enticed by a doctor insured by the defendant to engage in sexual intercourse with him and also with third persons in his presence.
Plaintiff had previously filed an action for alienation of affections and for criminal conversation against the insured. The insurance company had refused to defend that action. The plaintiff then made a settlement with the insured under which a judgment for $50,000 was entered against him, but with a prior “covenant not to execute” against the insured for any amount in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by60 opinions
- Griggs v. BertramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Red Giant Oil Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania v. Lexington Insurance Company v. Affiliated Risk Control Administrators of Pennsylvania, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America, Aetna Insurance Company, Cigna Companies and Johnson & Higgins of Pennsylvania, Inc. And Alexander & Alexander, Inc. And Duane Morris & Heckscher, a Pennsylvania Partnership and McCabe James J. Esquire Individually and Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Steil v. FLA. PHYSICIANS'INS. RECIPROCALDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. KivelaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.