Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1952No. 35212PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

This is an action for damages caused by the pollution of a stream, brought by the plaintiffs, Mae Williams, Jack Williams, C. E. Erwin, and Lelia Erwin, against the defendants, Continental Oil Company, a corporation, and others. The trial court overruled the motion of defendants for a directed verdict and submitted the cause to a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs were the owners of a tract of land in Pottawatomie county, through which flowed a stream or creek named Dance Creek. Defendants operated a small oil and gas field north and west of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bauman v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Skinner v. BowlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Champlin Refining Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. North v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Dorothy Williams v. Borden, Inc., and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API