Legal Opinion

Skelly Oil Co. v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 1939No. 28716PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

The plaintiff in error appeals from a judgment for $1,400 in favor of the defendant in error, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in an action to recover damages for the pollution of a stream and for the destruction of grass and trees and permanent injury to the soil of plaintiff’s land. It appears from the record that defendant’s producing wells are located on the watershed of Blacksmith creek, which enters Salt creek, which, along with Salt creek drainage ditch, runs through plaintiff’s farm. In the petition it is alleged that the defendant carelessly and negligently turned salt water,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cain v. Quannah Light & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Walters v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. City of Wetumka v. Cromwell-Franklin Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Fitzgerald v. CampbellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Safety Cab Co. v. FairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Richardson v. Farmers Union Oil CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Gerardi v. CarlisleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Massoth v. StaplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Champlin Refining Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API