Legal Opinion

Elzey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1999No. A99A0516, A99A0517PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

In separate bench trials, Mickey Elzey and Richard McDougald were convicted of possession of methamphetamine. Each defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. Because both cases raise the same issue, we have consolidated them for appeal, and we affirm the trial court’s ruling in each case.

In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, “the evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court; the trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility are adopted unless they are clearly erroneous and will not be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. People v. LaytonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Sprinkles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JourdanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. IckesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. People v. MaikhioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. State v. Ronald DupuisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API