People v. Perez
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
After his motions to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5) and set aside the information (Pen. Code, § 995) were denied, defendant entered a plea of guilty to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377) and unlawful possession of waterfowl (Fish & G. Code, § 2002). He was granted probation, on the condition he serve 60 days’ home arrest with electronic monitoring. Both parties appeal. Defendant contends his motion to suppress should have been granted because he was unlawfully detained at the fish and game checkpoint; the People challenge the sentence as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. IckesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- State v. ColosimoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- People v. MaikhioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Elzey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.