Luken v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S AND STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary of a habitation with the specific intent to commit sexual assault. V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 30.02(a)(1). Pursuant to a special issue submitted at the guilt/innocence stage of trial, the jury found appellant used or exhibited a deadly weapon in the course of committing the offense. Article 42.12, § 3g, V.A.C.C.P. Finding an enhancement paragraph “true,” the jury assessed punishment at 75 years in the Texas Department of Corrections.
While affirming the conviction,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Narron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.