Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1991No. 824-89PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Steven Mark Johnson, was convicted of murder in a trial by jury. After making an affirmative finding that appellant used a deadly weapon, the jury assessed punishment at forty years’ confinement and a $10,000 fine. The Texar-kana Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and held, inter alia, that (1) appellant was notified in the indictment that “use of a deadly weapon” would be an issue in the prosecution and (2) since there was more than a “mere modicum” of evidence, the evidence was sufficient to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Escobedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. Ex Parte HuskinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Narron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API