United States v. Undetermined Quantities of an Article of Drug Labeled as "Exachol"
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff the United States Federal Food and Drug Administration (“the FDA”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. against defendant U.S. Health Club, Inc. (“Health Club”) seeking to condemn the seized Exachol as a misbranded and unapproved new drug. Because Exachol is entitled to be considered under the Health Claims for Food Policy, the motion for summary judgment is denied.
The Parties
The FDA is an agency of the United States Government. It develops regulations and information programs and conducts research required to ensure the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- James Joseph Corselli v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, James E. Sullivan, [Pedro] Berrios and Ronald G. BoltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mary Carter Paint Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carroll Kisser v. Henry G. Cisneros, Secretary of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Kellogg Co. v. MattoxDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
- United States v. Pro-Ag, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Mineral Resources International v. United States Department Of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Mineral Resources International v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995