Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Mary Carter Paint Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 8, 1965No. 15PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

Respondent Mary Carter Paint Company1 manufactures and sells paint and related products. The Federal Trade Commission ordered respondent to cease and desist from the use of certain representations found by the Commission to be deceptive and in violation of § 5 of *47the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 719, as amended, 52 Stat. 111. 15 U. S. C. § 45 (1964 ed.). 60 F. T. C. 1830, 1845. The representations appeared in advertisements which stated in various ways that for every can of respondent’s paint purchased by a buyer, the respondent would give the buyer a “free” can of equal quality and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Carter Products, Inc., and Sullivan, Stauffer, Colwell & Bayles, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  5. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API