Legal Opinion
United States v. Pro-Ag, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1991No. Civ. 4-89-560PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Additionally, defendants move for an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and attorneys’ fees will be denied.
FACTS
Plaintiff United States of America initiated this lawsuit on behalf of the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) pursuant to the Food, Drug, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Harry E. ClaiborneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Articles of Drug for Veterinary UseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Articles Of Drug For Veterinary UseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Pro-Ag, Inc. Spencer W. LandswerkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992