Legal Opinion

Kellogg Co. v. Mattox

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 12, 1991No. Civ. A. CA 3-90-2005-GPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the motion of plaintiff Kellogg Company (“Kellogg”) for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

FINDINGS OF FACT

I. Nature and Status of Suit

1. This suit was filed by Kellogg against Texas Attorney General Jim Mat-tox and Commissioner Robert Bernstein of the Texas Department of Health (“TDH”) (collectively, the defendants will be referred to as “the State” or “Texas”). Kellogg’s complaint alleges claims for injunc-tive and declaratory relief under the Commerce Clause of the United States…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caraker v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2001
  2. United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Pearson v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. Kellogg Company v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API