Legal Opinion

Price v. Middleton & Ravenel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 31, 1906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Before DantzlEr, J., Charleston. Action by Thomas M. Price against Middleton & Ravenel. From' order placing case on Calendar 1 for trial, defendants appeal. No argument furnished Reporter. cite: What cases are triable by jury? 17 S. C., 542; Code of Proc., 274; 43 S. C., 303. Partner’s remedy for breach of contract: 22 Ency., 2 ed., 205; 168 U. S., 335; 10 N. Y., 489; 134 Mass., 505;. 15 Ency.

Read the full summary

Before DantzlEr, J., Charleston. Action by Thomas M. Price against Middleton & Ravenel. From' order placing case on Calendar 1 for trial, defendants appeal. No argument furnished Reporter. cite: What cases are triable by jury? 17 S. C., 542; Code of Proc., 274; 43 S. C., 303. Partner’s remedy for breach of contract: 22 Ency., 2 ed., 205; 168 U. S., 335; 10 N. Y., 489; 134 Mass., 505;. 15 Ency. P. & P., 1005, 1028, 1045; 2 Lindley on Part., 4 ed., 1025; 2 Hill Ch., 19; 10 Allen, 141. Intention of parties in continuing the contract: 22 Ency., 2 ed., 27, 28; 145 U. S., 611; 2 Strob., 473; 4…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

This appeal is only from an order of Hon. C. G. Dantzler, Circuit Judge, refusing a motion made by the defendants to. transfer the cause from Calendar 1 to Calendar 2, but it involves, important questions as to the right of trial by jury and the equity jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas. The complaint thus states the contract, which is the basis of the suit, and its consideration:

“That heretofore, to wit: on the first day of April, 1896, the plaintiff was well informed, skilled and equipped in the manner of the conduct of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Devereux v. McCradySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  4. Providence MacHine Co. v. BrowningSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kuznik v. Bees Ferry AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Newell Contracting Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Murray Drug Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API