Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Foster

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 23, 1925No. 11836PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

These were nine separate actions brought by the plaintiff bank against the defendant J. C. Foster and eight others, upon several notes signed by them, executed under the circumstances hereinafter detailed. The plaintiff made a motion before his Honor, Judge Shipp, to consolidate the nine actions, and to refer them to the Master of Florence County. Judge Shipp passed an order consolidating the actions, but refusing to refer them, upon the ground as stated in his order:

“An accounting is neither asked, nor áre there allegations…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Norris v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  4. Peterson v. DillonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. P. Cox Shoe Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Georgian Company v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. People's Bank v. HelmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Bishop v. BishopSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. DeTREVILLE v. GROOVERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Sumter Hardwood Co. v. FitchetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API