Legal Opinion

Newell Contracting Co. v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 13, 1924No. 11608PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is a suit upon two causes of action, aggregating $8,940.89, which amount is claimed by the plaintiff to be due by the defendants, on account of the transactions hereinafter detailed. Por convenience, the plaintiff, Newell Contracting Company, will be referred to as Newell, and the defendants J. R. & J. D. Blankenship, as Blankenship.

In July, 1916, a large road-building contract, covering several roads, was awarded upon- competitive bids by the board of pike commissioners of Hawkins county, in the State of Tennessee (hereinafter…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Nickles v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Piedmont Interstate Fair Ass'n v. BeanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. Georgian Company v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. People's Bank v. HelmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  5. Sumter Hardwood Co. v. FitchetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API