Newell Contracting Co. v. Blankenship
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
This is a suit upon two causes of action, aggregating $8,940.89, which amount is claimed by the plaintiff to be due by the defendants, on account of the transactions hereinafter detailed. Por convenience, the plaintiff, Newell Contracting Company, will be referred to as Newell, and the defendants J. R. & J. D. Blankenship, as Blankenship.
In July, 1916, a large road-building contract, covering several roads, was awarded upon- competitive bids by the board of pike commissioners of Hawkins county, in the State of Tennessee (hereinafter…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Nickles v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Piedmont Interstate Fair Ass'n v. BeanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Georgian Company v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- People's Bank v. HelmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Sumter Hardwood Co. v. FitchetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.