Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Andrews
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBerger, J.
In this appeal, we address the extent to which a creditor of one joint account holder may garnish funds in a joint account when another joint account holder is a non-debtor. We shall hold that there is a rebuttable presumption that joint account holders own the funds in an account, but that the presumption of joint ownership can be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.
In the present case, Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”), appellant, obtained a judgment against John Andrews, appellee (“Son”). Morgan Stanley moved to garnish the funds held in a joint bank…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Johnson v. Mayor & Council of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- McFarland v. Balt. Community LendingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019