Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Molders' Union, Local No. 68
District Court, S.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suit by the Nil es-B emeu t-Pond Company, a corporation, against the Iron Holders’ Union, Bocal No. 68, and others. On application for temporary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
The members of the Iron Holders’ Union, Rocal No. 68, numbering about 115, and working for the Niles Tool Company, an Ohio corporation, at Hamilton, Ohio, struck on May 24th. Aside from other orders taken by the Tool Company, it was then under obligation to the plaintiff to fill a number of large contracts for heavy and urgently needed machines, which plaintiff had agreed to deliver at an early date to the United States, and which are required by the United States as war necessities for use in machine shops, ship and naval yards, and naval gun factories. The contracts of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Helm v. ZarecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dail-Overland Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919
- People v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Vonnegut Machinery Co. v. Toledo Machine & Tool Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1920
- Balasquide v. Guilhon & BarthelemySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
- Balasquide v. Guilhon & BarthelemySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.