Legal Opinion

Vonnegut Machinery Co. v. Toledo Machine & Tool Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 7, 1920No. 235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Bill by the Vonnegut Machinery Company against the Toledo Machine & Tool Company and others. Temporary injunction against certain defendants to issue.

1Opinion of the Court

KILLITS, District Judge.

The complainant, an Indiana corporation, began this action by filing, January 16, a bill against the Toledo Machine & Tool Company, an Ohio corporation, known herein as the “defendant company,” and ten individual defendants, William Gable< and others, who, with John J. Quinlivan and two others, and the Central Labor Union of Toledo and Toledo Lodge No. 105, International Association of Machinists, additional defendants brought in by an amended bill of complaint, filed January 21, before answer, will be known as the “labor defendants.” On the coming in of the amended *194bil…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tom Brady v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. W. E. Anderson Sons Co. v. Local Union No. 311Ohio Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API