Legal Opinion

Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Kelly

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 16, 1895No. 617PublishedCited by 170 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. This action was brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Yirginia by the Lehigh Mining and Manufacturing Company, as a corporation organized under the laws of the .Commonwealth óf Pennsylvania. Its object was to recover from the defendants, who are citizens of Yirginia, the possession of certain lands within the territorial jurisdiction of that court.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. This action was brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Yirginia by the Lehigh Mining and Manufacturing Company, as a corporation organized under the laws of the .Commonwealth óf Pennsylvania. Its object was to recover from the defendants, who are citizens of Yirginia, the possession of certain lands within the territorial jurisdiction of that court. The defendants pleaded not guilty of the trespass alleged, and also filed two pleas, upon which the plaintiff took issue.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

Some of the paragraphs of the agreed statement of facts are so drawn as to leave in doubt the precise thought intended to be expressed in them. But it is clear that the individual stockholders and officers of the Yirginia corporation, in February, 1893, organized the Pennsylvania corporation; that immediately thereafter, on the 1st day' of March, 1893, the lands in controversy, which the Yirginia corporation had for many years claimed to own, and which, during all that period, were in the possession of and claimed by the present defendants, who are citizens of Yirginia, were conveyed by it in…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-Road v. LetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. McSparran v. WeistCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API