Legal Opinion

Village of Glenview v. Zwick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 2005No. 1-03-2446PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia

On March 14, 2002, the plaintiff, Village of Glenview (Glenview), filed a second-amended complaint against the defendant, Michael Zwick, alleging that in addition to refuse ordinance violations, it was entitled to recover attorney fees from Zwick based on section 1.13 of its municipal code. Glenview Municipal Code, ch. 1, § 1.13 (eff. June 21, 1994). Zwick moved to dismiss Glenview’s petition for attorney fees. On July 10, 2003, the circuit court granted Zwick’s motion to dismiss finding section 1.13 was “an impermissible use of Glenview’s home-rule powers [111. Const. 1970, art. VII, § 6(a)]…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Chicago v. RomanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Scholtens v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ampersand, Inc. v. FinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Oakbrook Terrace v. Suburban Bank and Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Shempf v. ChavianoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. Shempf v. ChavianoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Youngberg v. Village of Round Lake BeachAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API