City of Oakbrook Terrace v. Suburban Bank and Trust Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley
Plaintiff, the City of Oakbrook Terrace (City), sought to enforce a zoning ordinance regulating off-premises, freestanding, outdoor advertising signs against various defendants that owned or leased either existing legal, nonconforming signs or the property on which such signs were located. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Relying primarily on section 7 — 101 of the Eminent Domain Act (Act) (735 ILCS 5/7 — 101 (West 1998)), the trial court found that the City could not require alteration of defendants’ signs without paying them just compensation. Accordingly, it granted…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Arangold Corp. v. ZehnderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Scadron v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Ampersand, Inc. v. FinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Danada Square, LLC v. KFC National Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Jones v. The City of CalumetAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Ally Financial Inc. v. PiraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Ally Financial Inc. v. PiraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.