Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Roman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1998No. 84268PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Freeman

Following a bench trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, Edwin Roman, was convicted of the Chicago municipal offense of assault against the elderly. Chicago Municipal Code § 8—4—080 (1990). The circuit court imposed a sentence that was less than the mandatory minimum sentence prescribed by the ordinance. The City appealed. The appellate court reversed and remanded for resentencing consistent with the ordinance. 292 Ill. App. 3d 546. We allowed defendant’s petition for leave to appeal (155 Ill. 2d R. 315) and now affirm the appellate court.

BACKGROUND

The City’s evidence at trial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. People v. ArnaIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. People v. MalchowIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Assn'nIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Chicago v. StubHub, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API