Legal Opinion
Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Ass'n
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 28, 2010No. 1-08-2436PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald Smith
This cause of action arose when Gary Palm (Palm) sought production of various books and records from 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Association (Association), pursuant to the City of Chicago Condominium Ordinance (Chicago Municipal Code §13 — 72— 080 (2009)) (the Ordinance). The Association did not comply. Palm subsequently brought suit against the Association, the board of directors of 2800 Lake Shore Condominium Association (Board), and Kay S. Grossman (Grossman), individually and as president of the Board (collectively, defendants). Defendants claimed that the Association did not have…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Scadron v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Chicago v. RomanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Assn'nIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Hall v. Naper Gold HospitalityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Byrd v. HamerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- 1010 Lake Shore Ass'n v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Hall v. NAPER GOLD HOSPITALITY LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.