Legal Opinion

Wernle, Ristine & Ayers v. Yund

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2003No. 93S02-0207-EX-399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On Civil Transfer

DICKSON, Justice.

This appeal challenges an order of the Indiana Worker’s Compensation Board (“Board”) stating that no expenses of a *993claimant-employee’s physician shall be paid by the employee. We hold that such a determination is within the Board’s authority to approve the fees of physicians, and that the record in this case fails to demonstrate that the Board’s ruling conflicts with the attorney-client fee agreement or the lawyer’s professional obligations regarding the payment of litigation expenses.

The designation of parties to this appeal arises from the unusual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stump v. Commercial UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Buckler v. HiltIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bauer v. BielIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Richert v. SchreiberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wernle, Ristine & Ayers v. YundIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API