Legal Opinion

Wernle, Ristine & Ayers v. Yund

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2003No. 93S02-0207-EX-399Published

1Opinion of the Court

790 N.E.2d 992 (2003)

WERNLE, RISTINE & AYERS, Intervenor-Appellant,

v.

Janice YUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, and

The Kroger Company, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93S02-0207-EX-399.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

June 30, 2003.

James E. Ayers, Wernle, Ristine & Ayers, Crawfordsville, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

G. Terrence Coriden, Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, David L. Steiner, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Worker's Compensation Board Of Indiana.

On Civil Transfer

DICKSON, Justice.

This appeal challenges an order of the Indiana Worker's Compensation Board ("Board") stating that…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stump v. Commercial UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Buckler v. HiltIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bauer v. BielIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Matter of MaleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API