Legal Opinion
Kamerer v. Newsom
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 17, 2023No. 4:23-cv-02893Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANNA M SCHASKER, Case No. 23-cv-02893-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING 9 v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) 10 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Anna Schasker’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC” 13 at Dkt. 18). The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and 14 then screened her original complaint under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e), concluded “that [it did] not 15 state a claim upon which relief can be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Campbell, Tom v. Clinton, William J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Ted Berkic v. Michael Crichton, Robin Cook, Marvin Moss, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/united Artists Entertainment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- The Henry Bierce Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.