Ted Berkic v. Michael Crichton, Robin Cook, Marvin Moss, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/united Artists Entertainment Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff appeals the district court’s judgment disposing by various means of his copyright and Lanham Act claims, We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In 1968, the plaintiff wrote a 54 page screen treatment that he called Reincarnation, Inc. Hoping to interest a studio in producing a film based on his work, he gave the screen treatment to a literary agent, defendant Marvin Moss, and asked for his help. Moss read Reincarnation and suggested that the plaintiff collaborate with defendant Michael Crichton on a “shared-credit” basis. The plaintiff declined the offer.
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John William See v. Christopher Durang and L.A. Stage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Litchfield v. SpielbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. McA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Sonya Jason v. Jane FondaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Jason v. FondaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1981
3Cited by83 opinions
- Yourish v. California AmplifierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Alveda King Beal v. Paramount Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Lou Shaw Eastborne Productions, Inc. v. Richard Lindheim Michael Sloan Universal City Studios, Inc. Columbia Broadcasting Systems McA Television, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hartman v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Michael Skidmore v. Led ZeppelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.