San Antonio Public Service Co. v. Fraser
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Justice.
Although the date does not seem to be disclosed in the briefs of the parties, the transaction here involved occurred in the ■days of the trolley car in the city of San Antonio. The fact is still fresh in common memory that those cars were divided into two classes, the one-man car, and the two-man car. The former was operated by a lone motorman, at the front end of the ■car, where all passengers both entered and left the car. The two-man car was operated by a motorman, stationed at the front •end, and a conductor at the rear, and passengers could enter only at the rear…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamoryTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Paris & Great Northern Railroad v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- San Antonio Public Service Co. v. FraserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
3Cited by9 opinions
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Scott v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. EnloeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- State, Parks & Wildlife Department v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.