Legal Opinion

San Antonio Public Service Co. v. Fraser

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1936No. 9710PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Although the date does not seem to be disclosed in the briefs of the parties, the transaction here involved occurred in the ■days of the trolley car in the city of San Antonio. The fact is still fresh in common memory that those cars were divided into two classes, the one-man car, and the two-man car. The former was operated by a lone motorman, at the front end of the ■car, where all passengers both entered and left the car. The two-man car was operated by a motorman, stationed at the front •end, and a conductor at the rear, and passengers could enter only at the rear…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamoryTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Paris & Great Northern Railroad v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. San Antonio Public Service Co. v. FraserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Scott v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. EnloeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. State, Parks & Wildlife Department v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API